Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Hillary Clinton’s Twitter Chart of Doom

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Wednesday, June 17th, 2015
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 3:10 PM
    Posts
    10,759
    Post Thanks / Like

    Hillary Clinton’s Twitter Chart of Doom

    Interesting data mining.............

    http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politi...bfcL&ocid=iehp
    (Bloomberg) -- The polls had her winning. Prediction models had her winning. Financial markets had her winning. But Twitter had Hillary Clinton losing, with a steady downtrend in sentiment that foreshadowed her stunning defeat to Donald Trump on Election Day.

    The 2016 campaign featured more than 300 million tweets mentioning Clinton or Trump, with the Republican commanding a dominant two-to-one share of that conversation. Both candidates faced unprecedented unfavorable ratings among voters, but sentiment on Twitter gave Trump an edge. From his June 16, 2015, campaign announcement through Election Day, tweets mentioning Trump were 51 percent positive (+1). That compares to 51 percent negative (-1) for Clinton since her announcement on April 12, 2015, according to data from social media analytics firm Brandwatch provided exclusively to Bloomberg.

    Clinton’s Twitter sentiment wasn’t just net-negative throughout the campaign. Amid relentless attacks from Trump and repeated blows from leaks of her staff’s e-mails and investigations into her own, it also became more and more negative. Clinton’s best day on Twitter in 2016 was April 9, when she campaigned for the New York Democratic primary on home turf in Brooklyn, with 79 percent of mentions rated as positive (+29) by Brandwatch. Her worst was Jan. 9, with 75 percent of mentions negative (-25) in the run-up to the campaign’s first votes in the Feb. 1 Iowa caucuses. But a 200-day moving average of those scores—smoothing the volatility of day-to-day swings—reveals a near-constant decline in sentiment toward Clinton.

    Social media analysts call real-time Twitter data “the firehose” because it flows so thick and fast. Their challenge is to build algorithms that collect millions of tweets about a topic, and then code those tweets as positive or negative—even to the level of individual phrases—so a tweet like “Hillary Clinton is wonderful but Donald Trump is terrible” is rated as a positive mention for Clinton and a negative one for Trump.

    Of the hundreds of millions of tweets mentioning either candidate’s name or a selection of candidate-specific hashtags like #ImWithHer or #TrumpTrain, about 20 percent passed through Brandwatch’s filter to be coded as positive or negative, while the rest are marked neutral. The trends in those positive and negative mentions are what corporate clients like Wal-Mart and Dell use to gauge the mood of their customers—and what can help reveal the mood of voters toward Clinton and Trump.

    Clinton’s long-term, 200-day moving average never recovered after it first turned negative on May 1. That crossover was driven largely by a string of down days in March and early April, when the eventual Democratic nominee suffered several primary and caucus defeats to Bernie Sanders—including surprise losses in Michigan and Wisconsin, states that would also turn against her in the general election. Even in the month of August, as Clinton soared in the polls following the Democratic National Convention, she enjoyed only three days of net-positive sentiment on Twitter.

    Clinton and Trump’s online fortunes reflected their offline styles in the campaign. For Clinton, it was a steady march—although, on Twitter, in the wrong direction—while for Trump it was a volatile battle. Trump’s Twitter sentiment plummeted in March and early April as he suffered primary defeats in states like Utah and Wisconsin. Then in the rest of April and May, it skyrocketed as northeastern states like New York put him back on the path to the GOP nomination. Unlike Clinton, however, Trump’s long-term Twitter sentiment trended slightly upward throughout 2016.
    Continued at link.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Wednesday, October 2nd, 2013
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 9:19 PM
    Posts
    12,809
    Post Thanks / Like
    Trump will wisely continue to use Twitter as the modern "fireside chat", a vehicle to speak directly to the people. He just did that refuting the MSM claim he asked for top secret clearance for his children.

    I wonder if Soros and the boys will realize in their top secret meeting that the American people (for the most part) are no longer fooled by the MSM unless of course they close to be fooled.
    If it pays, it stays

  3. Likes scott liked this post
  4. #3
    Join Date
    Tuesday, October 1st, 2013
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 8:52 PM
    Posts
    10,512
    Post Thanks / Like
    I'm not sure I'd put a lot of stock into measuring sentiment of the entire voting populace by looking at Twitter. It's got some problems:

    1. It's hardly representative. Most people on Twitter don't tweet about politics.
    2. It's hardly representative. Most people are not on Twitter enough to glean their sentiment.
    3. It's full of manipulation. About 4-10% of all Twitter accounts are fake and they are the most proliferate tweeters.
    4. It's susceptible to selection bias. People who aren't happy but aren't that angry don't tweet about their favorite [insert team here].
    5. Twitter is biased.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Wednesday, June 17th, 2015
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 3:10 PM
    Posts
    10,759
    Post Thanks / Like
    Quote Originally Posted by scott View Post
    I'm not sure I'd put a lot of stock into measuring sentiment of the entire voting populace by looking at Twitter. It's got some problems:

    1. It's hardly representative. Most people on Twitter don't tweet about politics.
    2. It's hardly representative. Most people are not on Twitter enough to glean their sentiment.
    3. It's full of manipulation. About 4-10% of all Twitter accounts are fake and they are the most proliferate tweeters.
    4. It's susceptible to selection bias. People who aren't happy but aren't that angry don't tweet about their favorite [insert team here].
    5. Twitter is biased.
    Don't know anything about Twitter, just thought it was a different kind of analysis.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •